Penerapan Pengajaran Langsung Berbasis Behaviorisme Melalui Latihan Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Matematika
Abstract
The objectives of this study are: 1). to receive empirical data about the implementation of mathematics learning (integral / anti-derivative subject) using fully behavior-based through guided practice, 2). to find out the improvement of Integral (anti-derivative) mathematics learning outcomes by using direct discussion based on behaviorism through guided exercises. The implementation of this research uses a class action research design, which each cycle includes: planning (planning), implementing the action (action), observation (observation), and reflection (reflection). The research subjects were lecturers and second semester students majoring in Natural Sciences, FMIPA Unima, in the 2018/2019 academic year, who participated in learning Mathematics Integral (anti-derivative) totaling 25 students. The results showed that the Implementation of Behaviorism-Based Direct Teaching through Guided Exercise To Improve Learning Achievements Integral subject was effective, because: (a) student activities in effective learning, (b) the ability of instructors to teach effective learning, (c) student responses to learning were positive, (d) classical learning completeness is obtained, in the amount of 100% of students obtained a value of ≥ 2.00. This research was carried out as much as 2 cycles, in the first cycle of learning has not been effective, because the mastery factor has not increased, there are still 6 students who have not been thoroughly completed individual, and the second cycle of individual and classical learning completeness has been fulfilled. Thereby providing guided practice on behavior based that students can do to discuss Integral (anti-derivative) material and this class action research cycle is terminated in cycle II.
Keywords: direct teaching, behaviorism, guided practice, and mathematics learning achievement
References
Aning,W. (2006). Pemberian Latihan Terbimbing Dalam Mengajarkan Pokok Bahasan Integral di kelas X. Laporan PTK. Jawa Timur.
Arends, Richard. (2001). Learning to Teach (2thEdition). New York: Mc.GrawHill, Companies, Inc.
Buchari Alma. (2009). Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Budiningsih, A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chotimah,H dan Dwitasari, Y. (2009). Strategi-strategi Pembelajaran untuk Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Malang: Surya Pene Gemilang.
Dimyatidan, Mudjiono. (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Herawati, S.dkk. (2009). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Masnur Muslich. (2012). Melaksanakan PTK Itu Mudah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Moleong, Lexy. (1991). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nur,M. (2005). Guru yang berhasil dan Model Pengajaran Langsung. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Unesa.
Ratumanan, T.G. (2004). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sobel, M dan Maletsky, E. (2003). Mengajar Matematika (terjemahan Suyono). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Soedjadi, R. (2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas.
Sriyanto, (2007). Strategi Sukses Menguasai Matematika. Yogyakarta: Indonesia Cerdas.
Subanji. (2011). Pembelajaran matematika Kreatif dan Inovatif. Malang.
Suherman, E. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Tampomas, H. (2005). Matematika untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Yudhistira.
Tukiran, dkk. (2011). Penelitian Tindaakan Kelas. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Zainal Aqib. (2016). Model-model, Media dan Strategi Pembelajaran Konstektual (Inovatif). Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Zubaidah, A dan Risnawati. (2016). Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36412/dilan.v2i2.2094
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.