Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar di Masa Pandemi Covid19 di Kota Manado

Margareta O Sumilat(1), Sarah Tombokan(2),


(1) Universita Negeri Manado
(2) Universita Negeri Manado
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine whether the performance of elementary school teachers in Manado City was in accordance with the expectations of the parents. To answer the objectives of this study, researchers conducted research based on the quantitative descriptive method with Importantnce Performance Analysis (IPA) method analysis. The results of the research conducted show that based on the results of the calculation of the average performance appraisal (performance) performance of elementary school teachers in Manado City is below the average rating of expectations (Importance): 2.67 <4.21 and the performance of each variable of service quality. The results of the respondent's assessment score (suitability level) are below 100% (65.7% <100%) which means that it is not satisfactory. The interpretation of the Cartesian diagram can be explained as follows: aspects or attributes that affect teacher performance satisfaction, namely aspects of work quality (1) and aspects of communication. Otherwise. Aspects that are good and in accordance with what the community expects and their performance needs to be maintained (quadrant B) and the result is only one indicator, namely ability (4). In other words, there are achievements made by teachers, in this case, according to the parents, is the teacher's ability to carry out teaching. From the results of the research and data analysis, it can be concluded that based on the analysis of the results of the study, it can be concluded that the overall indicator of the performance level of teachers in elementary schools in Manado City based on processing and data analysis falls into the Low category which must be improved implementation.


References


----------https://dapo.kemdikbud.go.id/progres-sd/2/176000) (diakses 1 Maret 2021)

Asep Totoh. 2020: https://kumparan.com/asep-totoh/kompetensi-guru-di-masa-pandemi-1taYz3xylBC/full).(diakses 1 Maret 2021)

Bastian, Indra. 2001. Akuntansi Sektor Publik di Indonesia. Edisi Pertama.Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Emiy Sulistianingsih. https://lpmpkaltara.kemdikbud.go.id/2020/09/04/kebijakan-kemendikbud-di-masa-pandemi/ (diakses 1 Maret 2021)

Jajat Sudrajat:/ https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jreb/article/view/2434/1689

Keputusan Bersama Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, Menteri Agama, Menteri Kesehatan, Dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 01/Kb/2020 Nomor 516 Tahun 2020 Nomor Hk.03.01/Menkes/363/2020 Nomor 440-882 Tahun 2020 Tentang Panduan Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Pada Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021 Dan Tahun Akademik 2020/2021 Di Masa Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid19).

Lemeshow, S., dkk, 1997, Adequacy of Sample Siza in Health Studies, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York

SE No. 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan Dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran COVID-19

Sedarmayanti. 2001. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supranto. 2006. Mengukur Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan atau Konsumen. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

tmaka, Dri. 2004. Tips Menjadi Guru Kreatif. Bandung: Yrama Widya

Uno, Hamzah B. 2008. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Yamin, Martinis dan Maisah. 2010. Standarisasi Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Persada Press.


Full Text: Remote

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 137 times
Remote Download : 31 times

DOI: 10.36412/ce.v5i1.2637

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Civic Education: Media Kajian Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.